texting is the causality System or Human

 

Texting! is the causality “driving instruction & testing or anarchy”?

  • we know that teens are told not taught to drive with a more listen less learn instructor system*.
    • Only 7% of actual processes being managed by teens, does this create vacant timezones and become a causality?
    • If teens were taught effectively automating continuous partial assessment, managing each Road User Interaction RUI, the amount of free time that is available that is spent texting would not be there.
  • we know the test does not guarantee learners are assessed against competency based outcomes CBO
    • if I can pass my licence without managing any road user interaction I am conditioned to believe steering a car is all I have to do to be safe?
    • lots of downtime is then available which would allow for another activities!
  • We know licence testing does not assess crash risk management
    • the fallacy purported by the instructional system “look in the mirror” has no road safety outcome, which Creates a crash causality

Is texting causality, poor driving instruction or humans deliberately taking a risk? the evidence shows?

*research files https://idrivesafety.com.au/research/

#Idrivesafety

@drivingcoachesassociation

#drivingcoaches

#reducetheroadtoll